hello, art
...Monday night, i went to see a compilation of experimental animation shorts chosen by Richard Reeves. many of the works were his own, with other works by members of Calgary's Quickdraw Animation Society. much of Reeves' work takes a synesthetic approach, expressing sound as visuals. in effect, it asks the viewer to hear with their eyes. i was interested and engaged, but i don't feel like i experienced it as viscerally as others did. as i watched, it raised a number of questions for me about art, and how we interact with it. since i am fairly literal minded, maybe some of you who are creators can take a stab at answers - educate this philistine!
- how do we know when we are in the presence of art?
- is art relative? can something be art for me, but not for you?
- is art meant to be interpreted, or should it be experienced without trying to fit it into a framework of meaning? or both?
- what is art for? is it wrong to ask that question?
1 Comments:
The answers to your questions:
Yes.
:)
Lately I've found that getting out to see stuff* and reading essays have been keeping me from getting too depressed over the problems with how we structure areas of support for contemporary arts.
*=by stuff, I mean GOOD stuff that doesn't stink of "Official Culture that will Feed Tourists". I mean, I love well-crafted ceramics, tartans, and sea-scape folk art as much as the next person, but we deserve more variety than that, don't we?
Post a Comment
<< Home